Los Angeles DUI defense attorneys often face an uphill battle when defending clients against DUI charges, especially when
DUI blood tests are involved. A
DUI blood test can be inaccurate and cause a variety of problems, something most Los Angeles DUI defense attorneys understand.
Several months ago, the San Diego Chargers' wide receiver Vincent Jackson was arrested by the California Highway Patrol under suspicion that he was driving under the influence. The officers allegedly saw him drive erratically. Officers first tried to administer a breathalyzer test, but Jackson was administered the blood test after the officer's breathalyzer test didn't work. Police said he failed the sobriety test. Jackson also has a previous DUI charge from 2006. He has pleaded not guilty to the current DUI charges.
During a Los Angeles
DUI blood test, a sample of blood is taken from the driver, which can measure the amount of alcohol in his or her blood. This type of test can identify traces of any substance ingested, and is purported to be very accurate. They are usually more accurate than breathalyzers. However, errors can be made in transportation, storage, and administration of the
DUI blood test.
You can refuse to take Field Sobriety Tests and Preliminary Alcohol Screening tests that happen before an arrest. However, if you are arrested, you shouldn't refuse the chemical test you are asked to take after your arrest. If you refuse this test, consequences can be more severe than if you cooperate.
When taking a chemical test, your options are to either take a breath alcohol test or a blood test. There are pros and cons to each test. The breath test is less accurate, which could result in a false reading on your blood alcohol content. Also, since the officer knows your blood alcohol content right away, his report can be written to fit the results of the breath test. However, because of the breath test's lack of reliability, it is also more contestable in court, and can sometimes be dismissed.
In general,
DUI blood tests are considered more accurate. The results of the test are not immediate, so the arresting officer must complete his report before he knows your blood alcohol content, so the report cannot be tailored to fit the results of the test. However, if your blood alcohol level is actually high, the blood test is more likely to get an accurate reading of your blood alcohol content, making the results difficult to refute.
If you, like Vincent Jackson, have taken a
DUI blood test, you should have the help of an experienced DUI attorney. Contact the lawyers of Kestenbaum, Eisner & Gorin LLP to support and defend you from the charges you are facing.